This paper was definitely more difficult for me to write than the first major paper. I found it difficult to not take a stance on whether Locke or Hobbes was better and I had a hard time incorporating effective counterarguments. I chose to write on the first prompt as well so it was hard to know if i effectively portrayed both theorists in effective way or if I just skimmed the surface of what the question was asking. I think that my arguments for Hobbes were fairly weak and should be used more effectively in my final draft. I just need some criticism to know where to go in my draft. I have over 4 pages written so its a matter of knowing what to change for the final. Should I organize my paper different for the final? Do I lean towards Locke being better too much? Should I go deeper in my arguments?
Pingback: damenjc
Pingback: kiernan