I’d like the most review on how I can expand my counter-argument. I think I have a good grasp of why both governments exist, and I hope I did a decent job of laying that out here. I tried to give Hobbes a thorough, clear presentation of his argument for why his government exists, but I can’t help but feel like his section of my paper seems weaker. I ultimately see his form of government as having weaker structure, and maybe I’m just letting my views on Hobbes influence my views on Hobbes’ section of my paper, but I can’t tell if I’ve given Hobbes a fair chance here.
I think I was able to present Locke’s structure for government fully, but I think my wording in his section may need some re-organizing. I have his whole argument laid out in my head, but it’s a struggle for me to figure out the best way to order his points in this paper. Thanks for your review and input.
Pingback: andrewc3
Pingback: kiernan