I wrote my paper about the threshold concept of normativity. I used Hobbes as a reference that helped me comprehend the idea of normativity and showed that the troublesome knowledge accompanying normativity are alien and tacit knowledge. I feel that once I understood normativity, I was able to understand political theory on a much higher level. However, this paper was a pretty difficult one for me to write. I thought that normativity might be too broad of a subject and therefore my paper would not be sufficient. I am wondering what everyone else thinks. Is it too broad or is it appopriate for a threshold concept? I do feel like normativity is a key component too political theory but I am just wondering if I should pin it down more. If so, how could I do that?
Pingback: kiernan
Pingback: damenjc