When I started my paper, I knew that I would be writing more heavily from the Plato perspective than the Goldman, because honestly I find Goldman to be overbearing and a little annoying. However, I do try to give both sides a fair shot at expressing their beliefs. I decided to replace the Crito/Socrates scene with Goldman and Plato, because I wanted to have a similar argument but with multiple sides. I need to work more on organizing my ideas so that the paper runs fluidly, and also fleshing out and differentiating between my ideas and those of Goldman, Plato, and Socrates. There is a certain metaphor that I’ve created off of Goldman that I wish to run with, but I am a little apprehensive about taking it in a completely random direction. Hopefully it will end up being comprehensive and thought provoking, and not stupid :). Either way, I’m really starting to enjoy my paper and I hope that the finished product reflects my ideas on the subject and is enjoyable to read.
Pingback: sportsoser
Pingback: Tim Carter
Pingback: Mitchell