When I first started writing my rough draft, I lacked a sufficient intro and buildup to the conversation of Socrates and Goldman. My main idea would be Socrates essentially attacking Goldman’s idea of anarchism and society without a government. Goldman would question how it would be legitimate for citizens to follow governmental rule and laws. The one problem I had with my rough draft was expanding on ideas and further analyzing the positions of Goldman and Socrates. I found it difficult to focus on one specific idea of one another and take that into detail for multiple pages. Another problem I had was that I was not engaged enough in the texts which made it really hard to make points from either Goldman or Socrates side. The dialogue that was in my rough draft was long paragraphs and was too formal. I didn’t really have any fun with my paper and I didn’t go off the rails at all. Reviewing my draft with my writing group and Paige really helped me see my essay in a new light. It helped me identify what was wrong with my essay and what direction I needed to take with it. I can be more free with my writing and take it in the direction I want. There is no right or wrong answer in these essays but making points from both sides is important. Even though my first rough draft had problems, it has improved my writing.
Pingback: andrewc3
Pingback: Ishmael Coronado
Pingback: damenjc