I really like your explanation of Whuffie, which flows well into the third paragraph of Smith-goggled analysis. The comparison you used (Julius rich vs. Julius poor) matched really well with the parts of Smith you chose.
While the last paragraph alone is really logical and well written, I’m not quite sure where it fits in with your greater argument. How are you trying to use “people are never happy / happiness is fleeting” (if that’s the message you’re trying to say) to support your thesis?
]]>